The Master Teacher Blog

Conversations about bias are not new, but there has been a more recent trend addressing the implicit biases that we develop naturally through the experiences we have, the experiences we don’t have, how we interpret our experiences, and what we learn from others. Biases influence what we believe about people and what happens to and around us. They influence our expectations, interpretations, and interactions with others, including our students.

Biases are invisible yet omnipresent. They subtly and persistently influence how we see and engage with our students, and as an extension, they can shape how our students experience learning in our classrooms. Our biases can influence our students’ emotional state and psychological development, and they can hold the potential to undermine our efforts and our students’ learning. Let’s explore five of the most common biases that haunt our classrooms and how we can counter them.

Expectancy bias. Also known as the Pygmalion Effect, this bias allows our perceptions of students’ potential to drive what we expect, how we support, and how we evaluate the work and behavior of students. Multiple research studies have shown this bias to have a significant effect on how well students learn and perform. This may be good news for students whom we perceive to be talented, but it is very bad news for students we perceive as having low potential. Expectancy bias can also influence student behavior. Students whom we perceive as well behaved can more easily be given extra chances and the benefit of the doubt, while students perceived as mischievous, sneaky, or otherwise prone to misbehavior are often blamed and punished more frequently and harshly.

How to counter: We can avoid expectancy bias by having high expectations for all students and not allowing past performance to shape our beliefs about their future potential. We might commit to supporting all students to build their potential. We can also focus on individual student progress rather than comparing the performance of some students to others.

Gender bias. This bias involves different perceptions about female and male students. As examples, girls are assumed to share characteristics such as being more likely to demonstrate good behavior and skills in reading and writing but not being as likely to demonstrate strong skills in math and science. Boys are seen as more prone to mischief and leadership roles and not as strong in communication and relationships. While there may be some natural gender-related tendencies present, girls and boys share more characteristics than not. Girls commonly demonstrate strengths and interests often attributed to boys, and boys often excel in areas that are perceived to favor girls.

How to counter: We can start by being conscious of the language we use, the assumptions we make, and the behaviors we practice that reinforce gender labels. We might make it a point to balance opportunities for participation, responsibilities, and leadership. Further, we can encourage and support students—regardless of gender—to enroll and excel in a wide variety of academic and career-related subjects.

Stereotype bias. Socioeconomic status, ethnic background, race, and other factors can play a role in how we see and interact with our students. We may hold lower expectations for these students’ learning and expose them to less rigorous curricular content. We may make negative assumptions about their likely behavior and commitment to learning. We may even press them less to perform than we do for other students.

How to counter: We can regularly check ourselves and our beliefs to be certain that we are not expecting or supporting these students’ learning less than that of our other students. We can focus on each student as an individual, value their strengths, and support their growth. We also need to review instructional materials and resources to avoid reinforcing stereotypes and to ensure positive models for learning.

Affinity bias. We sometimes encounter students with whom we feel a stronger than usual sense of connection. We may share similar personalities, backgrounds, interests, or even certain life challenges. Even without consciously deciding to do so, we can give these students more attention, encouragement, support, and positive feedback than other students. While the students who experience our affinity may benefit, other students often pick up on what they see as favoritism. As a result, they can feel unseen, ignored, or even disliked, and those can lead to feelings of resentment; meanwhile, the student who is the object of our affinity can experience separation, teasing, and jealousy from classmates.

How to counter: Being aware of our feelings and the consequence of showing favoritism is a good start. We might also be careful to provide equitable feedback and attention to all students. We could even go as far as collecting data on our interactions to ensure an equitable distribution exists among all students.

Confirmation bias. When we have a preferred approach or have done something in a certain way for some time, we can assume that it is the best way to do it, even when there is evidence that other approaches work better, at least in some circumstances. Equally challenging, when trying alternative approaches and strategies, we can find ourselves paying closest attention to information that supports what we expect rather than objectively evaluating evidence. Confirmation bias can leave us clinging to practices that are not effective or that are not as effective as other options and approaches.

How to counter: Commit to having current practices prove themselves. Start with an expectation that a different approach might be better, and collect evidence in an attempt to prove it. Allow the evidence, rather than pre-existing beliefs, to determine the outcome. However, be certain to practice the alternative approach long enough to become proficient before making a judgment.

Biases can be destructive, but they are not inevitable—and we are not helpless to them. We can educate and equip ourselves to understand and overcome their presence and their impact. Our commitment to our students can be the motivating force.

After the end of an eventful school year, the beginning of a well-deserved summer break can be a good time to step back, reflect, and attempt to make sense of the shifting, stirring, and often stubborn issues and challenges we face. The pace of our work can often make it difficult to see and make sense of what is happening in the world around us. Consequently, while we might busy ourselves trying to fix symptoms of problems, we might not truly understand the root causes of what vexes us.

Teachers, administrators, paraeducators, and other school staff members share many frustrations and distractions that can get in the way of serving students and supporting their learning. The challenge is to frame issues so that they can be understood and addressed. Fortunately, questions can often serve as tools to begin the process of understanding and lead us to see issues with greater depth and insight.

As we reflect on this school year and think about the next one—or the ones after that—we can use some key questions to guide our thinking, planning, and actions. Here are ten questions that may be useful to the quest.

• How is the make-up of our student body changing? What do we know about changes in poverty levels, shifting demographics, expectations of education, career aspirations, and other experiences, expectations, and challenges that shape our students’ relationships with us and learning? How might shifts in make-up of the student body be having an impact on academic achievement, behavior, social cohesiveness, and other issues we observe?
• What forces are shaping the ways in which our students relate to each other and us? Technology, social media, and political divisions may be at play. Shifts in housing development and availability or in socioeconomic appearances might also be factors. We may not be able to change or dismantle these forces, but recognizing them can help us to understand, give guidance, and provide resources where appropriate. We might teach students more or different coping mechanisms, coach useful skills, and offer other opportunities to counter what they face.
• What rules and expectations no longer serve the purposes for which they were established? Consider that chewing gum was a big no-no in the 1950s (and in some schools and classrooms still to this day!). Hair and skirt length were flashpoints in the 60s. Some schools had policies about students’ “bold beauty” expressions in the 80s. What battles are we fighting today that need a “ceasefire” and a reset? Cellphones and smartwatches are receiving lots of attention, for valid reasons, but they are likely not the only elements to consider.
• What routines and rituals no longer seem relevant to—or serve the interests of—our students? Tradition components of student dances, pep assemblies, theme days, and some clubs might be places to start our reflection. How are we shifting what we offer to align with what students find interesting and worth engaging in? Esports, niche clubs, and student-generated activity ideas might be good starting places.
• What instructional practices no longer generate the same levels of engagement and learning? Teaching harder, persisting longer, and pushing more may not be the answer, especially when those things occur at the expense of teacher morale and student achievement. It may be time to shift approaches, let go of long-held assumptions, and explore other strategies. As examples, what if we began our instruction where students are, not where we want—or where the curriculum expects—them to be? What if we gave students more choice and voice in what and how they will learn? What if, instead of us setting goals for students, students were expected and supported to set goals for their own learning?
• How clear are we about the future for which we are preparing our students? Of course, no one can fully predict the future, but there is much that we can anticipate and plan for. What skills will students need to be successful? Where and how well are we teaching, nurturing, reinforcing, and having students utilize these skills as they learn?
• Do we need to revisit how are we defining success? Are test scores enough? Many educators, if not most, say no. What other data and indicators should be captured and analyzed? What might a comprehensive profile of success look like for our students? For our school or district? Students and learning are complex, and determining what defines success needs to reflect that.
• How are parent expectations changing? We know that in general, parent support has waned. What might be causing this shift? What might we do to better align what we do with what parents are expecting? What can be done to see higher levels of parent support, and how do we get there? Similarly…
• How are the ways in which parents and the community communicate and engage with us changing? Are periodic newsletters effectively communicating our message? How effective are the channels through which parents and the community communicate with us? Might we need to engage new or shift social media and messaging platforms? How will we know when we get it right?

Obviously, not every question on this list is relevant to your circumstance, and some of the ideas mentioned are more actionable than others. There also may be issues or topics missing from this list that you need to consider and plan for as you think about the coming year. You know your community and the issues and pressures that are likely to require attention and leadership in the next school year. Consider framing these items as questions for your reflection, investigation, and planning during the summer months—but make time to focus on relaxation and restoration, too.

This is a time of the year when educators can feel as though our energy levels have been depleted and are in need of a boost so that we can fully enjoy our summer breaks. For some of us, the school year has left us feeling utterly spent and focused only on getting through each day. As a result, we might have narrowed some of our interests and neglected activities that have excited, energized, and motivated us in the past. Or we may be looking for something to refocus, reenergize, and renew our sense of purpose and direction, especially as we look toward the summer months and hope for rejuvenation.

There is a historical figure whose approach to life can provide inspiration and guidance for living life to its fullest, staying vibrant, and being interested in the world around us: Benjamin Franklin. It must be said that there were aspects of Franklin’s life that were not admirable and are not to be emulated. Nevertheless, he was someone who fully embraced life. His contributions to science, culture, and other areas have endured. There is much we can learn from how he approached and lived his life, things that we can apply to our own lives to keep us fresh, alert, and engaged.

Richard Munson’s “Ingenious: A Biography of Benjamin Franklin, Scientist” is filled with insights and examples of what made Franklin and his life exceptional. Here are six lessons we can glean from his approach to life and the behaviors he practiced and promoted.

Benjamin Franklin was insatiably curious. Franklin had a wide variety of interests; his curiosity extended to include science, politics, literature, philosophy, history, and more. He did not fear appearing uninformed. In fact, what he did not know drove his enthusiasm for learning.

Lesson: We do not have to fear what we do not know or what people might think. Being willing to ask, explore, and experience can lead to energizing, motivating, and enlightening new insights.

Benjamin Franklin was deeply reflective. Benjamin Franklin began each day by reflecting on what he wanted to accomplish and ended the day with reflection on what he succeeded in accomplishing and what he needed to learn and improve. He believed that reflection is the key to remaining focused, moving forward, and becoming better.

Lesson: Life is a series of experiences. However, they only have an impact when we take time to reflect on and learn from them. Reflection can help us to avoid having repeated experiences that lead nowhere, and it encourages us to view every experience as an invitation to learn, grow, and move forward.

Benjamin Franklin reveled in discovery. He appreciated discovery when it was what he expected, but he delighted in discoveries that were not what he anticipated. In fact, Franklin treasured discoveries that dispelled assumptions and revealed new insights.

Lesson: Every day features activities and outcomes, some of which are planned and expected and others that are not. We might be reassured when what we expect happens, but the unexpected often reveals something worth exploring, appreciating, and treasuring. Our choice to revel in discovery can be an excellent source of inspiration and renewal.

Benjamin Franklin was a voracious learner. He was an avid reader and prolific writer. His reading included topics far afield from his formal career. Franklin understood that exposure to a variety of disciplines and perspectives broadened his understanding and grew his knowledge. His writing offered a means to process what he learned and sharpen his thinking.

Lesson: We can access information today through multiple means, but exposing ourselves to other perspectives, views, and knowledge is no less beneficial to our thinking and understanding. Similarly, we may not write letters and depend on formal communication as much as during Franklin’s lifetime, but the process of writing, through whatever means, can still solidify our thinking and keep our minds sharp.

Benjamin Franklin was a constant networker. He maintained a wide array of friends, colleagues, and contacts. His engagement with others spanned an expansive array of disciplines, expertise, and backgrounds. Franklin saw interactions with others as valuable sources for learning, discovering fresh ideas, and challenges to his thinking.

Lesson: The social networks we form can be excellent sources of information, insight, and encouragement. When our networks include people who think differently than we think, have experiences that are different than our experiences, and who bring insights and ask questions that challenge our thinking, they can be great resources for freshening our learning and sustaining our growth.

Benjamin Franklin sought balance in life. Despite the breadth of interests and involvements that filled his life, Franklin advocated for balance and moderation. Finding time for recreation and rest from work helped him to maintain his energy and remain mentally sharp.

Lesson: Life can seem to be filled with limitless expectations and demands. As a result, we can find ourselves spending a disproportionate amount to time and energy in one area while neglecting others. Unless we commit to setting boundaries, finding balance, and practicing discipline, exhaustion and frustration will be our frequent companions as we make our way through life.

Without question, life today can be challenging. However, there are elements and aspects of life that are universal and timeless. Benjamin Franklin lived in a difference century, but much of what he promoted and practiced still has value today. Our task is to learn the lessons we need to live the life we seek.

As humans, it’s fair to say that we generally like to feel competent and confident. Confidence comes with knowing what is expected of us, and we feel competent when we know how to respond effectively to the challenges we face. Feeling competent provides us with a sense of comfort, control, and stability.

However, preoccupation with feeling competent can get in the way of our learning and growth. Wanting to feel competent can keep us in our comfort zone when we need to venture outside of it and into our learning zone. Moving beyond our comfort zone can expose us to risks, missteps, mistakes, and fear, and in turn, we can experience stress, feel anxious, and be embarrassed.

Still, we are not likely to grow unless we are willing to nudge ourselves to gain new experiences, try new approaches, and build our learning. We need the courage to experience feelings of incompetence if we hope to grow, learn, and move to new levels of competence.

At times, we may actively choose to venture into circumstances that leave us feeling incompetent. At other times, the conditions and context within which we live and work change, leaving us feeling incompetent and needing to change and grow in order to regain our competence. Let’s explore five circumstances in which our feelings of incompetence can be the stimuli we need to move us forward and lift us higher.

1. When taking on a new role. Early days and weeks in a new role can present us with tasks and challenges that generate feelings of incompetence. At the same time, these experiences can offer the freedom to explore the purpose and effectiveness of common practices and procedures. While we may ask many “how” questions, we can be free to ask just as many “why” questions. We can also explore different approaches and test common assumptions that later, when we have settled in, might cause uncertainty and create consternation among colleagues. Our willingness to embrace our feelings of incompetence and our commitment to learning can be the fuel we need to gain the confidence and competence we need to succeed.
2. When practicing a new strategy. Learning and applying new strategies can feel awkward and inefficient at first. Yet, overcoming feelings of incompetence requires that we persist until we gain the understanding and skill necessary for the strategy to work. Meanwhile, trying something new often offers opportunities to make mistakes without undue shame or embarrassment. We can take risks, examine consequences, and learn from experience. We can be free to try various options and discover what works best before settling into a preferred approach.
3. When conditions change. When circumstances change, populations shift, or teams are reformed, we face the challenge of discovering how we need to alter our thinking and practices. Assumptions about what works may no longer apply. Consequently, we may no longer feel competent in areas we used to take for granted. A new context can free us to explore new approaches, develop a new understanding of our work, and create new relationships that lead to learning and new levels of competence.
4. When learning to use new tools. New tools come with new processes and new applications and may even require new skills. Old ways of doing things may be replaced by more efficient approaches and new processes. Our lack of knowledge and experience can free us to explore uses of and applications for the new tool(s). Our feelings of incompetence can free us to ask what may seem like obvious questions without others expecting us to already have the answers, and we can tap the insights and experience of colleagues to accelerate our learning and build our competence.
5. When facing new expectations. Feelings of incompetence that accompany new expectations may present the greatest challenge. New expectations can leave us feeling that what we have been doing is not good enough. They can challenge what we believe and assume about ourselves, our practice, and our students. We can feel resentment and be resistant. Yet, new expectations can also be an invitation to re-examine common processes and practices. They can lead us to set new goals. We can choose to open ourselves to new ideas and explore new approaches. Our confidence and feelings of competence return when we realize that we are capable of meeting new expectations with the adjustments we make and the strategies we adopt.

Feeling incompetent may not be comfortable, but it may be the push we need to build our skills, strengthen our confidence, and position us for future success. The key is to see what we face as an opportunity to take advantage of rather than a problem to avoid.

Teachers encounter challenges, hear complaints, and experience missteps—our own or our students’—nearly every day. We might assume that these experiences come with the territory and just need to be managed. In many cases, this thinking is correct, but often, by reframing what students do and say, we can find new answers to longstanding challenges and resolution to chronic frustrations. Consider these seven common occurrences and how they might be reframed to present an insight or alternative for our response:

• The student who makes what seems like a disconnected observation. Rather than immediately redirecting the student, we might explore whether the contribution reveals a fertile imagination or the ability to see connections between seemingly disconnected concepts or elements.
• The student who constantly seems to be asking “why.” Rather than ignoring the question or providing a shutdown response, we might explore and discover an insatiable curiosity that we can help focus and develop.
• The student who incessantly seeks our approval. Rather than dismissing them as tiresome or by offering a perfunctory response, we may find that we can provide reassurance and coaching to build their confidence.
• The student who challenges us. Rather than treating the response as a disciplinary matter, we might consider whether it is an opportunity to adopt new and more effective ways to diminish power struggles and sidestep needless conflicts.
• The student who refuses to work on a given day. Rather than pressing for compliance, we might seek to understand the reason for the behavior and then decide how we might redirect or otherwise engage the student.
• The student with whom we have struggled to connect. Rather than abandon our struggle, we might broaden our connecting strategies to show we care in ways we have not thought about or tried before.
• The student who resists our leadership but has followers among classmates. Rather than pushing back, we might engage the student as an emerging leader who needs us to help them to understand the importance of following without giving up power.

These are just a few examples of how we might reframe the experiences and challenges we face every day. Consider spending time reflecting on the distractions, frustrations, and interruptions you face and how you might reframe them to be more productive and satisfying as you navigate your day.

It may seem like multitasking is a key skill for maximizing productivity, responding to expectations, and managing tasks. Certainly, we can feel more productive when working on more than one thing. However, what we feel and what we accomplish may not be the same in measure. Despite the temptation to engage in multiple tasks simultaneously, research studies and careful reflection suggest that we need to be cautious about doing so.  

Why might multitasking not be a good idea? Our brains are not capable of doing multiple things at once. In fact, the term multitasking was coined by IBM in the 1960s to describe the way in which early computers were capable of operating. The concept quickly became popular because people thought that it was a good way to describe high levels of human output. The assumption was that multitasking—working on multiple tasks at once—must lead to greater productivity. However, studies as early as 2001 showed that multitasking is not an efficient way to get more done. In fact, multitasking requires our brain to constantly switch between tasks, but because the human brain is not wired to do this, what happens instead is that our attention moves quickly back and forth between tasks, ultimately creating inefficiency. As we multitask, our brain slows down and often loses track of important information—and neither task receives our full attention. Consequently, mistakes are more common, and quality suffers.  

So, how costly is task switching? A study by the American Psychological Association shows that even brief switches between tasks can reduce our productivity by as much as 40%. Tasks that require attention and cognitive control are more vulnerable to mistakes. Thinking tends to be more superficial, and important details can be overlooked. Meanwhile both working memory—holding current information—and long-term memory—managing recall—suffer by misunderstanding or misreading situations and failing to store crucial information.  

What does multitasking look like in daily life? In this day and age, multitasking has many faces. It is checking our phone, computer, or other technology for messages during meetings. It is working on a lesson plan while listening to a colleague discuss a problem they face. It is answering a student’s question while assembling materials for an upcoming lesson. It is monitoring social media or scrolling through the latest news while on a Zoom call. The list could go on.  

Are there some good applications of multitasking? There are at least some circumstances under which multitasking can, at least, not be harmful. Tasks that require little cognitive effort such as listening to music while doing routine chores or exercising can be more pleasurable without compromising mental processing. Multitasking can be helpful when tasks are complementary such as listening to a presentation while taking notes or reading directions while completing a related task. In some cases, multitasking can be helpful in creative work such as making a sketch or diagram while brainstorming the best solution to a problem or making notes while consulting research conclusions. 

When should we absolutely avoid multitasking? Here are four types of situations when we should focus solely on the task at hand: 

• Activities that are complex or cognitively challenging—including any tasks that require deep thinking or clear judgment such as analyzing data, making student placement decisions, and budgeting. 

• Tasks that require precision and detail—such as determining grades, documenting a student’s behavior incidents, and driving in heavy traffic. 

• Situations that involve strong emotions—such as resolving conflicts, offering relationship advice, and apologizing for a significant mistake. 

• Challenges that require creativity—such as solving complex problems, developing important plans, and brainstorming new processes and strategies. 

The bottom line: Multitasking is not necessarily good or bad. What matters is the context within which multitasking is practiced, the task to be performed, and the experience and expertise we can bring to the situation. The best advice is that if there is a question about whether to engage in multitasking—don’t.  

References: 

American Psychological Association. (2006, March 20). Multitasking: Switching costs. https://www.apa.org/topics/research/multitasking 

Brown, H. (2021, May 5). The myth of multitasking. Fast Company. https://www.fastcompany.com/90630548/the-myth-of-multitasking 

Adversity is not fun.

It can press and stress us.

It may depress and distress us.

It can even distract and untrack us.

Yet, adversity can also be a gift that lifts us.

It can be the force that strengthens our wills and builds our skills.

It is only natural that we do what we can to avoid difficult times and extraordinary challenges. We try to anticipate and moderate the problems we face, or we may attempt to sidestep conflict altogether. However, adversity is not always something that can—or even should—be avoided.

We may face adversity when a core principle or significant value is at stake. Adversity can emerge in our efforts to defend an object of importance or in our attempts to create something meaningful and lasting. Adversity also often comes in the form of conditions we do not create or are unable to control.

As difficult as adverse conditions and challenges may be, they can also provide amazingly valuable opportunities to learn and grow. Difficulties can present circumstances that enable us to experience our best selves. In fact, adversity might be the impetus to move us from hesitancy to confidence and from moderately skilled to expert.

Interestingly, the natural world offers some excellent metaphors for how experiencing adversity can offer hidden benefits and important opportunities for us to become our best selves. With this in mind, consider the following:

• The water in a mountain stream is fresh and pure because it tumbles over rocks, cascades over falls, and bounces over rapids. The same water caught in a stagnant pool is dark and stale.

Lesson: Facing challenges can keep us fresh and prevent us from becoming stale in our thinking and stagnant in our approaches.

• The brightest diamonds are formed by the greatest, most sustained pressure. Absent the presence of pressure, diamonds remain clumps of carbon.

Lesson: Pressure can be the gift that allows us to shine.

• The brightest lights shine on the darkest nights. On a sunny day, we can easily miss the presence of a strong light, yet the same light can be seen for miles when other sources of light have dimmed or been extinguished.

Lesson: Our work during the most challenging times can offer the greatest hope and make the biggest difference.

• In the face of a storm, domestic cows try to outrun and avoid the rain and wind, whereas buffalo turn into the storm, understanding that facing what is inevitable often makes it pass more quickly.

Lesson: Facing adversity directly can often shorten its duration and diminish its impact.

• Stormy seas make skilled sailors. While sailors might prefer to sail on calm waters, their best skills are developed when the waves are high and the wind is strong. In the absence of adversity, key skills remain undeveloped and untested.

Lesson: Times of adversity are valuable because they create conditions for us to learn and grow.

It is true that adversity is usually not pleasant. Still, it can be important to our growth and the difference we make. Adversity may not be our choice, but it can be our opportunity.