Quick Nav


Quick Search




Pin it

A disappointingly high number of college freshmen are required to take remedial mathematics and English courses as they begin their college careers. Pre-pandemic statistics indicate that as many as one in five high school graduates enrolling in four-year institutions must take at least one remedial course. Predictably, the challenge will grow in the aftermath of the disruption caused by COVID.


On its face, this information implies that these students have not received an adequate education in elementary, middle, and high school, or at least their preparation has not been sufficient for immediate success in college. Further, most college remedial courses require students to pay tuition, but the students receive no credit toward graduation. Consequently, students can find themselves falling deeper into debt before they even begin their path toward graduation. Studies also show that students who are required to take remedial courses are less likely to graduate with a degree, and if they do graduate, they are less likely to earn degrees that lead to higher compensated careers.


While it might be tempting to blame the high schools students attended, the situation might be more complicated than it initially appears. In fact, several forces are likely contributing to the problem, and they deserve scrutiny.


Students and families hear the message that college is a crucial part of the path to career success. The expectation has led to an increasing number of students enrolling in college, even when they have no strong interest in or commitment to attending. For many, college feels like the next educational step, and family expectations and aspirations feed this perception. Consequently, many students enter college without having made a commitment to the academic learning that will prepare them for success. This argument is not intended to place full blame on the students. Rather, it is recognition that the drive necessary to prepare for and succeed in higher education is often not present for several societal, community, familial, and personal reasons.


Of course, high schools share responsibility if they fail to help students understand the expectations and level of learning effort necessary for success in college. However, high schools face pressure to send as many students to college as possible since such data is often used as a proxy to signify the academic challenge and success of the school. This pressure can lead to encouragement for college enrollment even when students’ current performance makes college a risky choice. Meanwhile, the academic expectations and skill levels necessary for college success are not secret. Higher education institutions are typically eager to share information regarding the skills necessary for success at the college level. Sharing this information with students early in their secondary school careers might help them adjust their current learning efforts and inform decisions about post high school pursuits.


Institutions of higher education also need to share responsibility for this situation. The state of student academic preparation is not difficult to ascertain. In fact, this information is presumably part of the decision-making process used to assign students to remedial classes.


It is also true that higher education institutions face pressures that may influence their attention and decision-making. Students provide revenue. The more students who enroll, the more revenue they generate. Further, remedial courses generate revenue without having to grant credits. Since students who have to enroll in remedial courses often exit college early, the revenue they generate can presumably be reallocated to support more advanced students in programs that enroll fewer students and are more expensive to offer.


The challenge of academic remediation in higher education is important and must be addressed, but we need to be thoughtful about the approach. In fact, it appears to be a system problem, and system problems almost always require engagement from multiple stakeholders and perspectives to find effective, responsible solutions. It is time for higher education and secondary education to do more than point fingers. Students’ lives and futures are at stake. This problem can be solved, but it will require courage and leadership from all who play a role.

Thought for the Week

AI can teach and share knowledge, sure, but it lacks the key elements of human modeling, nurturing, and connecting that are essential components of a comprehensive learning process.

Share Our Page

We're in your corner!

Sign up to have the weekly publication
delivered to your inbox.

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Tips & Stories

Share your story and the tips you have for getting through this challenging time. It can remind a fellow school leader of something they forgot or your example can make a difficult task much easier and allow them to get more done in less time. We may publish your comments.

Sign up for our Newsletter

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.